New York’s New Bail Law

Ever since the new bail legislation took effect in New York State on January 1, 2020, a lot of people (e.g., clients, potential clients, friends, family, etc.) have been asking me what these changes to the law actually mean. The most common questions are whether a defendant who who killed a person(s) (e.g., criminally negligent homicide) or assaulted a person(s) will now have to be released without bail after being arrested and arraigned. And the answer is not a simple “yes” or “no.” The law is in a constant flux as courts render decisions and set precedent.

Conditions for a criminally accused to be released in exchange for money or “cash” (e.g., cash, credit card, bonds) while awaiting the outcome of his or her case have been pretty much abolished for all misdemeanors and non-violent felonies – although this also applies to a number of felonies that are violent in nature but are no longer viewed as such in the eye of the law – which is why there has been a great deal of criticism of this new bail legislation. Before this new legislation was put into place, the government (represented by the district attorney’s office) was able to ask the judge to impose bail on misdemeanors and non-violent felonies – which is why our jails have always been so overpopulated.

MANDATORY DESK APPEARANCE TICKETS

Before I get into some examples of misdemeanors and felonies that no longer qualify for bail, I want to discuss another sweeping change in the law. Prior to the enactment of the new law, defendants arrested for misdemeanors and Class E felonies (which is the lowest class level for a felony offense, A-I being the highest) would have to be arrested, go through the booking process and see judge before being arraigned. With the new law in place, police officers will no longer have the right to forgo a ticket, known as a Desk Appearance Ticket or DAT (which is a formal arrest without having to be held under arrest until arraignment) when arresting a defendant. Now, police officers will bring the arrested defendant to the precinct, issue a DAT, which gives the arrested defendant a ticket with instructions to appear in court on a certain date. After issuing the DAT, the defendant is released from the precinct without having to remain under arrest until being transported to Central Booking to be processed and see a judge.

Prior to the changes in the law, DATs would only be issued to defendants picked up on New York misdemeanors or petty offenses, such as minor marijuana possession charges (New York Penal § 221.10). And although the New York Criminal Procedure Law would allow for certain Class E felonies to be processed as a DAT, that rarely happened. Given the new legislation, police officers are now mandated to issue DATs to defendants charged with misdemeanors and class E felonies.

NEW BAIL LEGISLATION CONTINUED

Now, going back to the new bail laws that went into effect on January 1, 2020. Virtually all misdemeanor and non-violent felonies charges no longer qualify for bail since the new law went into place. In fact, many judges would start following this law prior to January 1, 2020, in anticipation of the changes to the law. I had a client who posted bail in the amount of $10,000 in a criminal sale of a control substance case. In December of 2019, the presiding judge exonerated my client’s bail since the crime he was charged with no longer qualified for bail. In other words, in the eye of the law makers, bail should not apply to non-violent offenses. However, keep in mind that certain misdemeanor and felony crimes are violent offenses yet in the eye of the law they no longer qualify for bail. But given that misdemeanors are not statutorily designated as violent – even if the alleged conduct appears to be violent (e.g., Third-degree assault, Fifth-degree arson, etc…) – bail will no longer apply to any misdemeanor offense in New York State.

Moreover, there is a large number of felonies that are designated as non-violent and do not qualify for bail, although they may seem and sound violent in nature. For example, Third-degree robbery, which is using physical force to steal property from another (without using/threatening to use a weapon or causing physical harm).

This new law that requires the mandatory release of a defendant who has been an arrested for a non-qualifying offense does not necessarily mean that the defendant will be released without any conditions. Courts can impose non-monetary conditions such as pretrial supervision programs, electronic monitoring such as an ankle bracelet, surrendering a passport , and travel restrictions. The courts can even impose bail on a non-qualifying offense if the defendant “persistently and willfully” fails to appear in court, commits another felony after being released on a felony, tampers or threatens a witness, or violates another court order such as an order of protection in a domestic violence or family case.

Whether the new law poses a higher risk to society or will result in more crimes is something that the legislators are currently looking at and discussing among each other. As of now however, this is the current law of the State of New York.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING. This blog post does not constitute legal advice. Prior Results Do Not Guarantee Similar Outcome.

What is an ACD and why is it so paramount to New York Criminal Defendants?

When a New York Criminal Defendant is charged with a crime, aside from an outright dismissal or not guilty verdict post trial, an Adjournment in Contemplation of Dismissal (ACD) is the best possible outcome in a criminal case. Usually, an ACD is available when the accused is charged with a misdemeanor crime such as Petit Larceny, Drug Possession, Trespassing or Disorderly Conduct and/or does not have a long criminal record.

For example, if you have been arrested for shoplifting and are charged with Petit Larceny, pursuant to New York Criminal Procedure Law (NY CPL) § 170.55, an ACD will provide you with a full dismissal of the charges in the interest of justice after a period of time prescribed by the judge – usually six (6) months – as long as you DO NOT get rearrested during the adjourned time period. Remember that your lawyer can make a persuasive argument to ask the judge for a shorter adjournment period.

You may ask “why would I want a shorter adjournment period?” During the adjourned period pending dismissal of your criminal charges, you have an open case, which may be visible in a background check. Thus, the shorter adjournment period your lawyer can get for you, the shorter amount of time a criminal case will be open and active under your name.

Why do you want your Lawyer to fight for an ACD?

An ACD in New York has many advantages. First and foremost, if you receive an ACD, you will not end up with a criminal record in New York State. Why? Because an ACD, as stated in NY CPL § 170.55(8) “shall not be deemed to be a conviction or an admission of guilt.

” Therefore, if you were not rearrested during the adjourned period, upon the end of the adjourned period, your arrest “shall be deemed a nullity and [you] shall be restored, in contemplation of law, to the status [you] occupied before [your] arrest and prosecution.”

This means that if a question on a school or job application asks you whether you were ever arrested for a crime and/or convicted of a crime, you can honestly answer NO because an ACD is not an admission of guilt. Rather, as stated above, an ACD deems the arrest and prosecution of your case a nullity, restoring you to the same position you were in prior to your arrest. As such, an ACD is almost as good as an outright dismissal.

Keep in mind that an ACD may come with community service or some kind of other rehabilitative program (e.g., Stop Lift) that you must complete, depending on the agreement between your lawyer, the prosecutor and the court.

Remember that an ACD is not easily obtainable and is not something you are entitled to by operation of law. Therefore, remember to hire an effective criminal defense attorney who will fight to get you an ACD or outright dismissal.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING. This blog post does not constitute legal advice. Prior Results Do Not Guarantee Similar Outcome.